Tweet Here, you can find Iain Duncan Smith's speeches and appearances in Parliament (provided by theyworkforyou):
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates I am grateful to be called so early in the debate, and I rise to speak to the amendments standing in my name and those of colleagues on both
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates I will give way first to the hon. Member for Walthamstow (Stella Creasy) and then to the hon.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates Yes. I take the hon. Lady’s point.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates First, I will give way to the hon. Member for Oxford West and Abingdon.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates We all have to stop agreeing like this, as it will give the House a bad reputation.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates I am grateful to my right hon. and learned Friend. I always bow to him in the knowledge of the law, as of course I would.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates That is exactly correct.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates They should, because the individual has to declare the whole chain. “Not knowing” would be no excuse.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates It might not, but I think it would, because it covers the information that individuals are asked to declare.
Clause 1 - Overview | Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill | Commons debates I agree that clarity is everything in this instance.