In Parliament

I beg to move, That this House has considered the anniversary of the Hong Kong National Security Law.

I stand corrected. My hon. Friend is quite right: it is 11, which makes it even worse.

These are abuses of human rights and democracy. The hon.

My hon. Friend knows very well that I agree completely with him. I was shocked to see that picture.

To clarify, there is a difference between the seizure of private assets and the seizure of state assets.

To clarify, there is a difference between the seizure of private assets and the seizure of state assets.

To clarify, there is a difference between the seizure of private assets and the seizure of state assets.

I am grateful to the Opposition for selecting this subject for debate.

I apologise for interrupting the right hon. Gentleman again. Sovereign immunity applies in international law to foreign judicial processes.

I am grateful to the Opposition for selecting this subject for debate.